Conversation
K. Ryabitsev
monsieuricon
Sometimes you write a piece of code that is "hacky," but kinda clever. Well done.
Other times, you write a piece of code that is both a nasty hack and really quite terrible to look at. That code isn't just hacky, it's downright "hurky." It's called that, because that's the sound you make at the back of your throat when you look at it.
I may be the only person who says "hurky," but now you can start saying that, too.
You're welcome.
(Hopefully in the context of fixing hurky code, not writing it.)
Other times, you write a piece of code that is both a nasty hack and really quite terrible to look at. That code isn't just hacky, it's downright "hurky." It's called that, because that's the sound you make at the back of your throat when you look at it.
I may be the only person who says "hurky," but now you can start saying that, too.
You're welcome.
(Hopefully in the context of fixing hurky code, not writing it.)
2
2
3
K. Ryabitsev
monsieuricon
Oh, and most purported "life hacks" are actually "life hurks."
Except the ones about rolling up your laundry. So satisfying.
Except the ones about rolling up your laundry. So satisfying.
0
0
1
Joe Lawrence
joe-lawrence
@monsieuricon Sounds like the kinda code I write and then double check with "shit show" instead of "git show" before pushing.
0
0
0