"For the people saying things like βIβm a PhD from xyz uni and Iβm telling your LLMs are just stochastic tools that make everything up and the world will fall apart if you use themβ, Iβm here to tell you that you are out of date. The world of software engineering has changed dramatically in the last few months."
https://medium.com/@tridge60/rsync-and-outrage-d9849599e5a0Thank you for voicing that, Tridge. Yes, I do a 100% agree that, as an industry, we're painting ourselves into a weird/dangerous corner where we're starting to depend on proprietary providers that produce code we don't have the bandwidth to fully own and understand. And yeah, pretty sure that $99 that I pay for a personal subscription is really more like $2000+ in real costs and is clearly not sustainable long-term. And yeah, all the other criticism for a technofascist utopia we're building around ourselves worries me greatly, too (but we've been doing that since long before LLMs).
However, anyone who claims that LLMs are not useful or produce universally bad results is just plain wrong, or are using dinky models. I've gone from yelling at junk produced by LLMs to going "yeah, okay, that's not bad." Sonnet is still crap, don't use it for anything serious. Anything you can produce on a local model running on your GPU is going to be unusable for anything serious beyond answering "how is babby formed" kinds of questions.
But let's move on from the "lolslop" kind of commentary. It's dumb.