Conversation
A LKML thread meme summary, pure shitposting because SCNR, not meant as an endorsement nor ridicule of any side
Show content
STOP DOING MSEAL()

SYSCALLS WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE GIVEN MM_SEAL_ FLAGS

YEARS OF MINMUTABLE() yet NO REAL-WORLD USE FOUND for using more than addr, len PARAMETERS

Wanted not to bother with that anyway to get a break? We had a tool for that: It was called "LD.SO"

"one place honors the sealing, random other places do not" - Statements dreamed up by the utterly Deranged.

LOOK at what Chrome has been demanding your Support for all this time, with all the mprotect(2) permission reduction & OPENBSD_MUTABLE we built for them.
(This is REAL Code, done by REAL Kernel developers).

ON_BEHALF_OF_KERNEL ?????

ON_BEHALF_OF_USERSPACE ???????

VM_SEAL_* -> MM_SEAL_* -> MM_ACTION_* ?????????????????

"Hello, I would like a MM_SEAL_MUNMAP but not MM_SEAL_MMAP VMA please."

They have played us for absolute fools
3
8
21

HAMMER SMASHED FILESYSTEM πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

re: A LKML thread meme summary, pure shitposting because SCNR, not meant as an endorsement nor ridicule of any side
Show content

@vbabka is @LWN still looking for guest authors?

1
0
3

@vbabka Now do sched_ext 😈

1
0
2
re: A LKML thread meme summary, pure shitposting because SCNR, not meant as an endorsement nor ridicule of any side
Show content

@lkundrak @vbabka We are *always* looking for guest authors β€” and would still really like to hire somebody full time.

1
0
2
@mpe not sure even the disclaimer would prevent getting angry emails afterwards for that topic ;)
0
0
2
re: A LKML thread meme summary, pure shitposting because SCNR, not meant as an endorsement nor ridicule of any side
Show content
@LWN @lkundrak @vbabka full time shitpost specialist? :P the actual write up on this topic was really good btw!

https://lwn.net/Articles/948129/
0
0
2
A LKML thread meme summary, pure shitposting because SCNR, not meant as an endorsement nor ridicule of any side
Show content

@vbabka I heard the trick is to mainly remove code. Everyone likes you if you remove code. :D

By that logic you should support the inclusion of the patchset so you can remove it later. :D

0
0
1