Conversation
joncruz@mstdn.social

Jon A. Cruz

No , not "rebel", but "evil 800 pound gorilla suing the life out of projects left and right"

Don't whitewash history

6
8
1
doctormo@floss.social

Martin Owens inkscape

Reply to @joncruz@mstdn.social

@joncruz

"Rebel". JFC, they make it sound like Microsoft was the plucky robin hood.

"How did we go from evil empire shouting about software cancer, to evil empire in a cuddly sweater with the embroidered words 'yay-open-source' in large friendly letters" - There, fixed it for you.

1
1
0
f4grx@chaos.social

F4GRX Sébastien

Reply to @joncruz@mstdn.social

@joncruz Microsoft trying to rewrite history is not surprising but still absolutely disgusting. They are always going farther in EEE strategies. This should be called out.

0
0
0
f4grx@chaos.social

F4GRX Sébastien

Reply to @doctormo@floss.social
Edited 10 months ago

@doctormo @joncruz the only part of open source important for them is "being allowed to use gratis code in commercial applications without sharing back"

I'm not being fooled by their love.

All they want is extend embrace extinguish, and sell more of their own crap.

0
0
0
lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me

Haelwenn /элвэн/ triskell

Reply to @joncruz@mstdn.social
@joncruz Also "pioneer" after the movement has been a thing for 40+ years, plus they destroyed Netscape on the strictly open-source side of things…
1
0
0
f4grx@chaos.social

F4GRX Sébastien

Reply to @lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me

@lanodan @joncruz this is the extinguish phase of EEE. Now they rewrite history using "respected" credentials like the "linux foundation".

0
0
0
ghisvail@framapiaf.org

Ghislain Vaillant

Reply to @joncruz@mstdn.social

@joncruz De rebelles à pionniers, rien que ça. Le moins qu'on puisse dire, c'est qu'ils ne manquent pas de toupet chez Microsoft.

C'est beau le révisionnisme technologique.

1
1
0
joncruz@mstdn.social

Jon A. Cruz

Reply to @ghisvail@framapiaf.org

@ghisvail true. So true.

0
0
0
pavel

Pavel Machek

Reply to @joncruz@mstdn.social
@joncruz Exactly. Microsoft is not an user-friendly company, it is actively exploiting its monopoly. Aka -- evil. Yes, it contributes to open-source when it make sense for them. If they pretend to be non-evil, where are Office and Windows sources?
1
1
2
larsmb@mastodon.online

Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷

Reply to @joncruz@mstdn.social

@joncruz I think when they say "rebels" they mean "oppressive militia".

0
0
0
About social.kernel.org

Terms of service

  1. Please do not use this service in violation of the Linux Kernel Code of Conduct. Doing so will result in your account suspension with the referral of the matter to the CoC committee.

  2. "Repeating"/"boosting" someone else's status on this platform will be treated as endorsement and will fall under rule #1.

  3. You are encouraged to use this platform to promote your work on the Linux Kernel, but there is no restriction on permitted topics (with the exception of anything covered by #1 above).

  4. There is no requirement to post in English, but it should be considered the primary language of communication on this platform.

Privacy notice

The admins of this service have access to all posted statuses. They aren't looking, but if it's something they shouldn't know about, then you should not post it on this platform.

Please see the Linux Foundation Privacy Policy, which applies to this platform as well.

Getting your own account

If you would like an account on this instance, please check that the following applies to you:

  • You are listed in MAINTAINERS or CREDITS

  • OR: You have a kernel.org account or email address

  • OR: You have a long and established history of involvement with the Linux Kernel

If the above is true and you agree with the Terms of Service and Privacy Notice listed above, please use these instructions to request an account: