No #Linux -next today or in the next two weeks from Stephen:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240613144524.22abd1a0@canb.auug.org.au/
[Update]
@broonie will "provide backup coverage" during that time (see replies for details).
[/Update]
@kernellogger Makes me question if it's a good idea to let one person be responsible for maintaining this tree while it's often meant to be used for basing your new changes on to not conflict with other changes that will be merged.
And I think also for (automated) testing it's very commonly used.
There were times when somebody else stepped in. Not sure if that will be the case here (I assume otherwise Stephen would have mentioned this).
But well, that's how it is with the kernel, as it's development ist not driven by some "foundation"[1] that hires people to do task like this (for docs, bug triaging, and a few other things this is a problem as well).
[1] but those have downsides, too!
@z3ntu @kernellogger I provide backup coverage, Stephen doesn’t like assuming that I’m always available or pressuring me into it and just announces his vacation with no assumption that anything will happen.
@gregkh @kernellogger @z3ntu Yup, when I provide cover it’s work time and I borrow a big aarch64 build machine we have to do the actual builds.