Conversation
3
21
1

@patricus @affine it's important we not hide the tragedies of the past from children

1
0
0

@mcc @affine well, yes and no, they should know that C and C++ exist, but nothing more than this.

2
0
0

@patricus @affine *thinks* how do you feel about teaching children FORTRAN

2
0
0

@mcc @patricus @affine ok but actually F93 or later might be an ok teaching language at the elementary/middle school level (basically for the same reasons as Pascal used to be)

Kids love BLAS, right?

1
0
0

@affine Great cartoon!

Aside: one can legitimately argue that most of the complaints heard here have more to do with the C library functions rather than the language itself. After spending the last 6 years writing in C++ (& Python), I miss using a language whose behavior I know w/o reference to documentation.

0
0
0

@lambdageek @mcc @patricus @affine
Mine can't get enough BLAS. I have to read them procedures from GotoBLAS or they refuse to sleep.

0
0
0

@patricus @mcc @affine
I feel like exposing kids to C++ is a step too far.

0
0
0

@mcc @patricus @affine As soon as they have mastered upper-case characters, they can start learning FORTRAN.

1
0
0

@geert @mcc @affine is fortran stil useful?
and, could you give me an example program?

1
0
0

@patricus @mcc @affine I guess it is, although personally I haven't touched FORTRAN since last century.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortran has examples. For real-world examples (probably in Fortran 90), I'd like to defer you to the experts...

1
0
0
@geert @patricus @mcc @affine Still useful, I heard. More limited language -> easier to optimize than C.
0
0
0