I'm all for a Linux phone and I'm extremely worried about the state of corporate (and governmental) surveillance we're forced to live in.
But I can't trust manufacturers who focus on hardware, don't pick a software ecosystem to focus their efforts on, and don't contribute meaningfully to said ecosystem.
Software alone is a HUGE budget to get a successful phone.
Relying on volunteers won't cut it.
@thibaultamartin As it always has: software sells hardware.
@thibaultamartin Please define "software ecosystem", as it feels quite ambiguous:
- if that's the GNOME/KDE/whatever ecosystem, then I beg to differ: those seem to be flourishing and do mostly fine by themselves (more contributions always help, ofc)
- if that means Linux-based software at large (including the kernel, systemd etc...) then I agree; but I'd stress the importance of a fully working, upstream/mainline kernel (and bootloader) as kernel hackers are very scarce in the mobile community
@thibaultamartin You're talking about Pine64 right? Hard agree if so
@pavel I don't agree with them rolling their own OS (PureOS) but otherwise I agree. Sadly they layed off most of their developers (at least the relevant ones for the Librem 5) and seem to be in severe financial trouble.
@bart yes, and the upcoming Liberux phone.
I don’t see anything in their communication or in their team indicating that they will contribute meaningfully to KDE, GNOME, or the upstream their os depends on.
@thibaultamartin Yeah I fully understand your worries. Them rolling their own OS is already a bad idea imo, and they should instead focus on writing and upstreaming their drivers and kernel changes and work with an existing distro and UI community.