@laho not making a statement or expressing an opinion so I'll pass :-) It is just smart thing to do since it is not wise to travel instable countries.
And I don't know about US legislation on non-profit organizations so would not make sense to speculate anyhow.
I only express my opinion in social media, if I can go to a court hearing and fully disclose the facts.
Just for the sake of example, in the case of FOSDEM I was vocal because:
1. Organizers had all information available on Jack Dorsey when they accepted the talk.
2. No new evidence has been disclosed that would compromise Jack Dorsey after that.
For example, it has been a known fact that Jack sold his shares to Elon Musk for the last couple of years already. Even if I hated Jack by gut I still would think that it was wrong doing because I defend integrity over my personal feelings about a person.
Objectively you can draw only two possible scenarios from this:
1. FOSDEM organizers are incompetent as fuck.
2. FOSDEM organizers have no integrity.
Both are quite unpleasant outcomes, but either of them must be 100% true, and I can't help it.
However, if I said anything about non-profit organizations in US, exports and related legislation that would be based purely on a belief system. It also comes down to the question of integrity: if I cross that line I will loose it.
At least when it comes to bigger possible issues. Everybody has their ups and downs, and talks nonsense sometimes. That's just life.