At least something done in the kernel side for the v4l2-loopback driver this week:
The next small push is to split v4l2_loopback_fops
into two: one for /dev/videoX and other for the anonymous inode returned back from the ioctl.
Got tired of updating clangd data manually so did a quick script to automate it :
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Copyright (c) Jarkko Sakkinen 2025
set -e
run_build() {
make ARCH=x86_64 O=.clangd -j$(nproc)
scripts/clang-tools/gen_compile_commands.py -d .clangd
}
run_menuconfig() {
if [[ ! -d .clangd ]]; then
exit 1
fi
make ARCH=x86_64 O=.clangd menuconfig
run_build
}
while getopts ":m" opt; do
case $opt in
m)
run_menuconfig
exit 0
;;
*)
echo "Usage: $0 [-m]"
exit 1
;;
esac
done
if [[ ! -d .clangd ]]; then
make ARCH=x86_64 O=.clangd tinyconfig
fi
run_build
It feels suboptimal that each fedi service requires a different account.
e.g. I have a Flohmarkt instance, which is different from my Mastodon instance. If I also ran a pixelfed instance, that would be a third account.
Rather than one "me", with different linked services.
Perhaps there is a need for a fedi directory service / "main" account, which people can use for discovering of sub-accounts?
(I can see that, for some users, separation of accounts will be valuable, so I wouldn't want to remove that ability.)
The New Yorker has unveiled its Jan. 20 (Inauguration Day) cover. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cover-story/cover-story-2025-01-20
Fedora Server Working Group has created a
10 question survey aimed at people who use #Fedora Server.
https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/fedora-server-f41
The goal here is to increase our knowledge of how people use the Server
offerings and what they do with it. In turn, this will help us priotise our efforts into areas that actually matter to our users.
Answering this survey will not take a lot of time, please consider helping us to help you with Fedora Server development.