Conversation

I'm doing a documentation site or "book" for my io-uring abstractions. I wonder if mdbook is adequate or should I try something else? It contains both code and images how to use them. Want it pretty with as little effort as possible ✨

2
0
0

@jarkko damn that looks nice and batteries included with community. thanks!

1
0
1
@pinkforest It's like "LaTeX for engineers"

Word is for managers, LaTeX is for scientists and there has been an empty "for Engineers" slot to fill up until Typst came out :-)

It also has Beamer alike package called Polylux: https://github.com/polylux-typ/polylux

For me this was love at first sight at least.
1
0
1

@Kijewski Thanks! Will try that out too. Think I might go maybe with typst Jarkko pointed out given it's 🦀 as I am based :) Will see how they compare.

1
0
1

@jarkko yeah it sure beats injecting KaTeX js on places where XSS comes as a feature 😬 It seems to offer some great visualization aids too which is 🙆‍♀️

0
0
1
@pinkforest @Kijewski My Rust "hate feedback" when it comes to kernel has been lately like:

1. "even if it is Rust we love also first in class commit messages"
2. "even if it is Rust I still need to be able to test this, not just compile"

I love Rust too but I still also love the best practices if of the ancient era :-) I commit to yelling on these until they start to be the status quo... It's called governance 🕶
0
0
1

@pinkforest mdbook is just alright. doesn't really look beautiful imo, but it does the job and is easy to use

1
0
0

@wffl yeah went with mdbook given it's got first-class citizen HTML render whilst typst HTML render seems experimental and more oriented for formal papers e.g. pdf

0
0
0