Conversation

It is 2025.

Customers want to run high-end storage performance tests for software released this month on 5.10.

(Yes, I know it's a (S)LTS kernel, but still, that's ridiculous.)

2
1
0
@larsmb Surely nothing has changed in Linux since 2020 :)
1
0
1

@larsmb I'm not surprised. Obsolete software tends to receive fewer updates, which is perceived as being “more stable”.

1
0
0

@ptesarik I know (and I also know it's partly "our" fault b/c we trained them to perceive updates as dangerous), but why even bother to test a software release (that brings in a fairly modern storage engine that relies on, well, modern kernel features among other things) on Debian Bullseye, which is out of security support and EOLs in <1 year?

That makes very little sense to me.

0
0
0

@gregkh @larsmb Definitely. Maybe a few lines in the MAINTAINERS file, but that's it, right?

2
0
0

@ptesarik @gregkh Probably tons of new bugs, best not to risk it.

(Which, yeah, can be valid in very specific environments. Which, uh, politely, I don't think most of them doing this qualify as. But again, I also realize *why* they do it and whose fault that ultimately is, I just don't like it.)

0
0
0
@darix @ptesarik @larsmb Good news is that it will be trivial to get root on the thing so that you can update the kernel yourself to a more secure one :)
1
0
3

@gregkh @larsmb @darix
Remember: Always close the backdoor behind you after using it.

0
1
0