Conversation
vbabka@mastodon.social

Vlastimil Babka πŸ‡¨πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

mm patches be like

4
2
2
hyeyoo

Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo

Reply to @vbabka@mastodon.social
@vbabka
Oh lol, I'm sure this will be the best kernel meme of the year :)
1
0
2
vbabka@mastodon.social

Vlastimil Babka πŸ‡¨πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Reply to @hyeyoo

@hyeyoo just a meme, right? No connection to reality, right? RIGHT?

1
0
1
ljs@mastodonapp.uk

ljs

Reply to @vbabka@mastodon.social

@vbabka @hyeyoo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=573SbYMLYTQ

0
0
1
oleksandr@natalenko.name

Oleksandr Natalenko, MSE verified

Reply to @vbabka@mastodon.social

@vbabka s/LLM/LLMM

0
0
1
vbabka@mastodon.social

Vlastimil Babka πŸ‡¨πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Reply to @vbabka@mastodon.social

oh no :(

1
0
0
oleksandr@natalenko.name

Oleksandr Natalenko, MSE verified

Reply to @vbabka@mastodon.social

@vbabka

--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slop.c
1
1
0
ffmancera@mastodon.social

Fernando F. Mancera

Reply to @vbabka@mastodon.social

@vbabka What were you saying yesterday about requiring the sender to refute the LLM?

1
0
0
vbabka@mastodon.social

Vlastimil Babka πŸ‡¨πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Reply to @ffmancera@mastodon.social

@ffmancera yep, it's spreading :(
I don't deny it can be useful and point out bugs, but not like this...

1
0
0
ffmancera@mastodon.social

Fernando F. Mancera

Reply to @vbabka@mastodon.social

@vbabka FWIW, in netdev it is not required to refute sashiko, although there is a Netdev LLM CI which is reviewed by a maintainer and if they consider the output is useful then you must refute it (if it is wrong).

1
0
0
ffmancera@mastodon.social

Fernando F. Mancera

Reply to @ffmancera@mastodon.social

@vbabka Btw, this netdev LLM is much better than sashiko tbh

1
0
0
vbabka@mastodon.social

Vlastimil Babka πŸ‡¨πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Reply to @ffmancera@mastodon.social

@ffmancera yeah I heard sashiko points out much more wrong stuff. Could be it's newer and needs more work, or the underlying LLM is worse.

0
0
0
michal@spondr.cz

Michal Ε pondr

Reply to @oleksandr@natalenko.name

@oleksandr @vbabka slap.c

1
0
0
vbabka@mastodon.social

Vlastimil Babka πŸ‡¨πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

Reply to @michal@spondr.cz

@michal @oleksandr slav.c

0
0
0
About social.kernel.org

Terms of service

  1. Please do not use this service in violation of the Linux Kernel Code of Conduct. Doing so will result in your account suspension with the referral of the matter to the CoC committee.

  2. "Repeating"/"boosting" someone else's status on this platform will be treated as endorsement and will fall under rule #1.

  3. You are encouraged to use this platform to promote your work on the Linux Kernel, but there is no restriction on permitted topics (with the exception of anything covered by #1 above).

  4. There is no requirement to post in English, but it should be considered the primary language of communication on this platform.

Privacy notice

The admins of this service have access to all posted statuses. They aren't looking, but if it's something they shouldn't know about, then you should not post it on this platform.

Please see the Linux Foundation Privacy Policy, which applies to this platform as well.

Getting your own account

If you would like an account on this instance, please check that the following applies to you:

  • You are listed in MAINTAINERS or CREDITS

  • OR: You have a kernel.org account or email address

  • OR: You have a long and established history of involvement with the Linux Kernel

If the above is true and you agree with the Terms of Service and Privacy Notice listed above, please use these instructions to request an account: