Conversation
Dear Gnome. This is supposed to be free software, not shareware. Nagging is not welcome.

Dear Debian. You are not supposed to allow anti-features in your repositories.
2
2
4

@pavel I actually don't think gnome should be the default desktop in any more. Mostly because they push external flatpak repositories so hard. Their developers will actually tell people not to use distribution packages, but grab from upstream instead (and I suspect part of that is related to their views about theming and customizations).

It should certainly still be a desktop option, but having the default desktop of a distribution whose core principle is DFSG tell you to avoid DFSG..

1
0
1

@pavel I don't have a strong opinion on what _should_ be the default, but I don't think gnome should be it.

2
0
1

Someone over on bsky responded with a bunch of non sequiturs like "why does it matter what the default is?", and.. I don't know how to explain why decisions about priority matter. 🤦

0
0
0
@Andres4NY On desktop, I'm still using Mate. On tablets/phones, I'm aware of Gnome and KDE.

I don't care much about which, but ... no anti-features please.
0
0
1

@pavel packaging Gnome has been always a huge pain, i can’t say how it goes nowadays but keeping software available for everyone when your distro ships 4 year old versions of the libraries adds a lot of pressure to the developers and maintainers. Flatpak has been a relief for me in many cases because I could install new programs without having to break the base system.

We should spend less time packaging, maintaining and backporting software, the value of software development is not there.

I somehow agree that gnome shouldn’t be the default DE in Debian, but the alternative is worse imho. I would opt for xfce if it was much simpler.

0
0
0