Conversation

Jarkko Sakkinen

Edited 15 days ago
I'm developing my own ostree and BuildRoot based operatingy system:

- https://codeberg.org/puu
- There will be puu-desktop and puu-llm builds.
- puu-desktop uses ext4.
- puu-llm uses ext4 + xfs for the models.
- puu-llm hosts k3s, llm-d and generally very latest of stack for running local LLM modesl.
- GNOME build is tough and I'm working on it but I have plan how to make in happen on BuildRoot.
- Given being BR2_EXTERNAL, builds and configures with beloved kbuild :-)

Despite having puu-llm build this project disregards AI contributions.

That said. I don't see it as a crime that you generate some initial code with LLM.

I do that sometimes too especially when I need to get an idea of e.g. alien projec. However, usually I do also spend week or few applying hard manual labor to make the actual code change I want to do despite having some random slop that functionality fits the bill.

This is what I do accept but it is generally best just to say plain no in README.md as most people will likely not be able to do such weighting.

[The logo image artwork is copyrighted by me (drawn with Inkscape) and licensed with CA BY-SA 4.0]
1
0
2
I want to promote the use of local/small infrastructures but the tools to define them in sofware stack are quite heavy and bad and not quick and lean.

For testing, debugging etc. of this type of project I'd recommend pi, as it seems to be only of these agentic clli's not being slop by itself (was developed by industry seasoned game programmer).
0
0
0