Conversation

Christian Brauner 🦊🐺

/me prepares to spam @monsieuricon with yet another series...

1
0
0
@brauner Hey, I'm happy to see the review features being used!
1
0
1

@monsieuricon it's so so so good. @daandemeyer and I have been chatting how much github sucks for review and how b4 review tui would just be an awesome experience to have for as well.

1
0
1

@brauner @monsieuricon I'm honestly amazed nobody's built some kind of Github local syncer yet that just syncs all of Github's prs and issues locally to allow local tooling like b4 review to be built on top of it.

2
0
0

@daandemeyer isnt that just `git-fetch` plus some incantation to get the review tui up?

@brauner @monsieuricon

1
0
0

@musicmatze @brauner @monsieuricon I want the GitHub review comments, inline comments, CI checks, and all the rest, so no, git fetch doesn't cut it (I wish it would be sufficient though).

0
0
0
@daandemeyer @brauner Integrating with Github is somewhat orthogonal to the main purpose, which is keeping development decentralized (or, at least, with an option to transparently fail over). However, there is already a way to sync issues into b4 bugs (using git-bug's bridge), so you're already mostly there. I hope to add more PR-related features to the next version (after 0.16 is out), so maybe I can look at it then.
0
0
0