Conversation

Jarkko Sakkinen

If I was hosting something and wanted to reject AI crap and someone complained about that, I'd just ask: "can you pay the bills?" :-)
1
0
1
@guenther @Codeberg Yeah, I did the announcement when it came out. First it did not make sense or "maybe it too extrreme". Then after reading it again +2 days I fully grabbed the point. It's a great argument.

And this is why I'm moving even my coding agent plugins from Github to Gitlab. They've turned to be popular (maybe, just maybe the reason could be that I know the source code and despite also AI assisted, I've paid at least as much of my vim-attention to them).

It's a problem because that makes me a potential target for slop bombing. Issues and PRs have turned weird enough that I have depart the sinking ship :-) And I've noticed the exact same thing: issues and PRs are like "task delegates" as a result of an agent hitting to a wall. No was time is saved as no one even considered why we want to submit this.

It appears as time as time was saved, as I'm the hidden part of the cost function :-)
1
0
0

Jarkko Sakkinen

Edited 23 days ago
@guenther @Codeberg I'm a kernel developer doing agent plugins for my own comfort; and well considered production use; definitely not an AI guy in psychosis. So yeah, I vote rather for no AI at Codeberg than that horrible slop that is still causing me traumas annihilates the site :-)

For me this is only a practical matter. I partition my projects between Codeberg and Gitlab already, which ever suits the best. There are many reasons to pick one over another, such as differences in the CI.
1
0
1

Jarkko Sakkinen

Edited 23 days ago
@Codeberg @guenther And based on my Github experienes, despite my projects being legit and actually a result of hard work, they draw attention of the slop tribe. They see in their own eyes doing as good stuff because that's how that drug kicks in. It's geek blow. So I gladly keep coding agent plugin elsewhere. Gitlab is great because it is the least-sexy Git hosting site :-)
0
0
0