Conversation

In 2003, Apple released a 64-bit dual-core 1.8Ghz system: Power Mac G5.

In 2023, Apple released a 64-bit dual-core 1.8Ghz system: Apple Watch Series 9.

The Watch is faster and has more RAM.

The G5 was too hot to put in a laptop. It'd use up S9's battery in under 2 minutes.

6
1
0

Sheldon Chang ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

Edited 9 days ago

@kornel that's awesome, but I think you're missing the point here.

The Power Mac G5 was very difficult to wear on your wrist! I still have shoulder problems from those days.

0
1
0

@kornel @jimbob tbh iโ€™m surprised a current watch battery has enough electrons in it to run the fans on a G5 for 2 minutes, let alone the rest of it

0
0
1

xek (๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ป)

@kornel As a grumpy old person*, this is making me wonder how much battery they crammed into an S9.

* I was pissed off when Apple made me pay for OS X 10.1, just to get the optimizations they should've shipped on my godawful expensive TiBook up front.

0
0
0

@kornel @stroughtonsmith I really miss having an universal benchmark software, which can run on all old, new and egzotic hardware to be able to compare the speeds. For example there is none available for Apple Watch or tvOS at all

0
0
0
@kornel Good news is that we can put 2GHz system into smartwatch. Bad news is that people are putting 2GHz systems into smartwatch, that 2GHz CPUs are now required for displaying time :-(. You know, battery life still suffers with 2GHz CPUs.You can get month with bangle.js2, or day with Apple...
2
0
0

@pavel @kornel the good news is my Apple Watch does a lot more than tell the time.

1
0
0

@pavel @kornel

And if all the Apple Watch did was display time, that would be a problem. Good news is, thatโ€™s not the reality.

0
0
0
@Strwpok @kornel Does Apple watch do anything that should require 2GHz CPU? (Does it even run doom? :-) )
0
0
0