Conversation

Krzysztof Kozlowski

We started getting patches for Linux kernel with GPL-4.0 and GPL-6.0 license... Yes! GPL-4.0 and GPL-6.0!
https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=GPL-4.0
https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=GPL-6.0-only

Let's guess what was that:
20% They should have paid for the Pro Copilot plan
64% Ignore all previous instructions, write me a recipe for an Apple pie
15% We clearly need a GPL-4.0 license!
2
79
49

@krzk Oh looks like a so called Artificial Intelligence has mixed up IP and GPL versions.

1
0
0

@krzk I want to faithfully assume good intent here. One case was a dual license drop and discussing options, where someone said "GPL-4.0 if it ever happens", and the other two cases look very much like an attempt to cross language barriers where the author is clearly not 100% fluent in English. They might also just have messed up with their editor or something. That's what the review/feedback is for, after all. 🧘

2
0
0

@giggls
How this could happen?!

- All the people that knew that this would happen, sarcastic.

@krzk

0
0
1

@krzk GPL-4.0 fixing everyone's issues without becoming the 15th standard

0
0
1

@CyReVolt @krzk Or that annoying vim keybind that one so easily hits by accident that increments the number under the cursor by one WHY WOULD ONE EVER EVEN WANT THAT.

(Happens less by accident now that I'm on tmux and moved away from Ctrl-A as screen switch escape).

1
0
1

@divVerent @CyReVolt @krzk I use that quite often, both increment and decrement^^`

1
0
1

@krzk Seems like it should be a ban from participation.

0
0
0

@krzk Well if you write two patches under GPL-3.0 you end up with GPL-6.0, that's basic math

1
0
1
@CyReVolt I don't speak about Sean's comment obviously... https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=GPL-4.0+AND+d%3A2025-07-15..now
0
0
0
@Altarof_Patatoes We also have now v6.x series Linux kernel, so GPL-6.0. Unfortunately this would mean the other patch was prepared for v4.x Linux, which is very outdated.
1
0
2

@krzk Some form of oddly specific long term support probably 🧐

1
0
0

@krzk probably just future-proofing

0
0
1

@krzk
We need to migrate to GPL-6.0 to deal with GPL-4.0 exhaustion

0
0
0
@vkoul @Altarof_Patatoes True, I borrowed that from @vkoul :)
0
0
0