Review on mailing list:
Copyright (C) 2026 Variscite Ltd. AI bot review and may be useless.
Copyright year is 2026, which is in the future. Should be 2024 or current year.
Great, now everyone will get to read useless AI agent reviews.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260303210131.2966214-8-Frank.Li@nxp.com/
If you're a swiss resident ( or know one ... ) you can get a custom hardware design onto an ASIC for FREE !!!
You get back one chip with your design (and a bunch of others!) and some board to help bring up/testing.
Also, this is "resident", no need to be a student or at uni or anything, you just need a valid Swiss address ...
I know I might be repeating myself here because I mentioned it a few month back but this bear repeating IMHO.
https://swisschips.ethz.ch/news-and-events/tiny-tapeout-submission-form.html
PS: Can I haz boost for reach ?
This is not a peace plan. It is a proposal that weakens Ukraine and divides America from Europe, preparing the way for a larger war in the future. In the meantime, it benefits unnamed Russian and American investors, at the expense of everyone else.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2025/11/trumps-war-peace/685024/?gift=hVZeG3M9DnxL4CekrWGK3x5H8-x30wTOq6lDtv0xjW4&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share
$ git describe
v6.18-rc3
$ git shortlog -s -n --no-merges
Oh! 5th place!
Donโt stop me now
Iโm having such a good time
Iโm having a ball
Donโt stop me now
TWIMC, the "Linus opposes Link: tags with links to the patch submission" is saga over, as Linus wrote:
""[โฆ] I do think that at least if people use the different domain, I won't complain.
I'm still not convinced it's a great idea, but at least it means that the "this is the source of the commit" is clearly separate from the "this is actual background". [โฆ]""
Not only did a permanent member of the UN security council attack a clearly marked UN humanitarian convoy with FPV Drones, they also proceed to proudly share the footage of their appalling crime on the internet.
When a vendor wants to control upstreaming process and objects to community-led patches, Iโll just point to this brilliant response from @conor:
Itโs only better if <vendor name> submits better quality patches (no evidence for that yet) or submits the patches more promptly than others (which clearly has not happened here), and offers review commentary etc at a higher standard and more frequently than a non-employee maintainer would be able to do (thereโs no evidence for that so far either, given youโre trying to stall this patchset). Your claim seems to have no merit as there is no proof that youโd do a better job.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250925-jaundice-uneasy-ff8b3b595879@spud/
Collaboration and communication are at the heart of Linux kernel development. In the second part of our series, we explore how to work effectively with the Linux kernel community.
Read more here ๐ https://lnkd.in/eYgrqWZs