An irregular reminder: #firmware is a category of #software .
If you advocate for #FreeSoftware but don't talk about #libre firmware, I'm interested I'm learning why you're making the exception.
@dcz I gave a talk on this "semi-firm firmware" subject and the challenges of free software approaches to it a couple years back at SCALE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xbvMtFLOmE
@dcz because its been accepted as an exception for soo long. Not as non software, but as even being considered for opensourcing. Your computer always ran opensource independent on what your bios was. Network card firmware? Can't say I've ever seen it opensource in real life, hardly ever as a topic of conversation.
So the explicitness comes from people excluding it.
@wmd Depending on what you mean by a network card, there is precedent:
@dcz Hot take: If anything, firmware is a thing that should be forced to be libre/opensource or at least source-available. You could make all sorts of arguments about other types of software - firmware is needed to get your metal running, they're forced upon owners of devices, so forcing them to be absolutely transparent is a logical requirement. It's crazy that this even a question.
@hagarashi8 I have a feeling even most dedicated people just gave up the fight. Whatever open-firmware solutions are left are not powerful or compatible enough for the masses, so no one is advocates for that because pragmatism.
Heck, my 12-years old main computer still has globs of firmware. But at least I complain and refuse to downgrade to something newer and without #Coreboot *shrug*.
@pavel How do you evaluate "good enough"? I can evaluate features in closed firmware, but on the bug side I'd be lost.
@pavel I think this agreement is missing in the community :)