Conversation
sj

sj

Edited 1 month ago

I wanted to know simple daily Linux kernel CVE statistics just for fun, so wrote a script[1] and plotted the output.

$ ./vulns_stat.sh ./vulns/ 30 | ../gnuplot/plot.py --data_fmt table --type labeled-lines --xtics_rotate -90 cve_stat_30_days.png

[1] https://github.com/sjp38/lazybox/blob/master/cve_stat/vulns_stat.sh

#linux #kernel #cve #stat

3
8
13
authentic_sammj@ozlabs.house

authentic_sammj

Reply to @sj

@sj I can see it hasn't slowed down any! :)

1
0
1
Issa@fosstodon.org

Issa

Reply to @sj

@sj wow. so, that's 450 security bugs in one month? 😳 😳 😳 😳 . can you confirm pls? what kernel?

1
0
0
sj

sj

Reply to @Issa@fosstodon.org
@Issa I cannot confirm since my script may have bugs ;) What the script argues is that about 450 (exact number is 440) security bugs for upstream-supporting Linux kernels are identified and got their official identifiers (CVE) within last 30 days.
2
0
0
sj

sj

Reply to @sj
@Issa For more context, I believe this great LWN article could be very helpful: https://lwn.net/Articles/961978/
0
0
0
sj

sj

Reply to @authentic_sammj@ozlabs.house
@authentic_sammj I have no opinion but only a humble script :)
0
0
1
Issa@fosstodon.org

Issa

Reply to @sj

@sj am really shocked with no of bugs. linux is still far from being secure. but patching such high number is good & inevitable . what was the kernel that you scanned?

1
0
0
sj

sj

Reply to @Issa@fosstodon.org
@Issa I didn't scan any kernel. Instead, I scanned others' kernel scan results :) You could use the source of the script for detail.
0
0
1
spmatich@ioc.exchange

spmatich blobcoffee

Reply to @sj
Edited 1 month ago

@sj this is why stopped tagging scores in Feb?

1
0
0
sj

sj

Reply to @spmatich@ioc.exchange
@spmatich IIRC, the Linux CNA team mentioned they will not give CVSS to new CVEs. I guess that's the reason. I don't find the link, though.
1
1
0
spmatich@ioc.exchange

spmatich blobcoffee

Reply to @sj
Edited 1 month ago

@sj @spmatich I don’t know if this *the* link, but it’s a link from synopsys a security product vendor. The post specifically links kernel CVE changes to NVD changes. So it seems at least some vendors have the position that the two events, Linux kernel having its own CNA team, and NVD stopped tagging CVSS, are correlated somehow

https://community.synopsys.com/s/question/0D5Uh000007i8czKAA/black-duck-nvd-and-linux-kernel-cve-process

0
0
1
About social.kernel.org

Terms of service

  1. Please do not use this service in violation of the Linux Kernel Code of Conduct. Doing so will result in your account suspension with the referral of the matter to the CoC committee.

  2. "Repeating"/"boosting" someone else's status on this platform will be treated as endorsement and will fall under rule #1.

  3. You are encouraged to use this platform to promote your work on the Linux Kernel, but there is no restriction on permitted topics (with the exception of anything covered by #1 above).

  4. There is no requirement to post in English, but it should be considered the primary language of communication on this platform.

Privacy notice

The admins of this service have access to all posted statuses. They aren't looking, but if it's something they shouldn't know about, then you should not post it on this platform.

Please see the Linux Foundation Privacy Policy, which applies to this platform as well.

Getting your own account

If you would like an account on this instance, please check that the following applies to you:

  • You are listed in MAINTAINERS or CREDITS

  • OR: You have a kernel.org account or email address

  • OR: You have a long and established history of involvement with the Linux Kernel

If the above is true and you agree with the Terms of Service and Privacy Notice listed above, please use these instructions to request an account: