Conversation

Requires a < /FOOT PATH > sign at the other end of the trail?

17
4
1

@Natasha_Jay yes! (I used to have a T-shirt, worn to shreds now, that had <body> on the front and </body> on the back. Wore it to a con and had people physically turn me around to see the other side.)

0
0
0

@Natasha_Jay
The closing tag should be </FOOT>.
Also, the PATH attribute requires a value.

2
0
0

@Natasha_Jay HTML (Hidden Trail Markup Language)

0
0
0

@Natasha_Jay Like that T-shirt with <BODY> on the front and </BODY> on the back

0
0
0

@Natasha_Jay I wish the photo was from back a ways to see the 'right' path. The left path is Not a foot path, it's a wagon trail! Unless, a wider view reveals 2 new paths. BUT FOR GOD Sake don''t walk into the pole and get hurt! Only people who can't read do this.

0
0
0

@Natasha_Jay

Nah, it's two mathematical expression:

: < FOOT

and

PATH > :

0
0
0

@Natasha_Jay yeah! Otherwise it would leak into all of existence, right?

1
0
0

@Natasha_Jay
Nah, that should be METER, not FOOT. Imperial units are so imperious.

0
0
0

@Natasha_Jay Is the trail well-formed even if the sign is not?

0
0
0

@bruce @Natasha_Jay I was thinking about FOOTPATH or FOOT_PATH

0
0
0

@bruce @Natasha_Jay No, HTML allows valueless attributes - at least some versions. You probably think of XHTML, the attempt to make HTML conform to XML.

1
0
0

@toriver @Natasha_Jay Yes, perhaps. I would have written it PATH="" at the very least.

0
0
0

@w4tsn @Natasha_Jay
It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to.

0
0
0
@Natasha_Jay Everyone knows this should be highway=path :-).
0
0
0
@Natasha_Jay I take that back. This is highway=track, tracktype=4, IIRC.
0
0
0

@Natasha_Jay
<foot_path="/usr/body/limbs/appendages/foot"/>

0
0
0