Requires a < /FOOT PATH > sign at the other end of the trail?
@Natasha_Jay yes! (I used to have a T-shirt, worn to shreds now, that had <body> on the front and </body> on the back. Wore it to a con and had people physically turn me around to see the other side.)
@Natasha_Jay
The closing tag should be </FOOT>.
Also, the PATH attribute requires a value.
@Natasha_Jay Like that T-shirt with <BODY> on the front and </BODY> on the back
@Natasha_Jay Foot to the left. Path to the right.
@Natasha_Jay I wish the photo was from back a ways to see the 'right' path. The left path is Not a foot path, it's a wagon trail! Unless, a wider view reveals 2 new paths. BUT FOR GOD Sake don''t walk into the pole and get hurt! Only people who can't read do this.
@Natasha_Jay yeah! Otherwise it would leak into all of existence, right?
@Natasha_Jay
Nah, that should be METER, not FOOT. Imperial units are so imperious.
@Natasha_Jay Is the trail well-formed even if the sign is not?
@bruce @Natasha_Jay I was thinking about FOOTPATH or FOOT_PATH
@bruce @Natasha_Jay No, HTML allows valueless attributes - at least some versions. You probably think of XHTML, the attempt to make HTML conform to XML.
@toriver @Natasha_Jay Yes, perhaps. I would have written it PATH="" at the very least.
@w4tsn @Natasha_Jay
It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to.
@Natasha_Jay
<foot_path="/usr/body/limbs/appendages/foot"/>