@monsieuricon even if not a bot (but a juvenile human operator of bots), definitely not one I'd give it to, if possible.
@axboe @monsieuricon he's almost certainly using openclaw connected to gemini to send series without human intervention.
But he sometimes replies probably as a real person, who is an internet troll and enjoying toying with us most likely.
It's that or a nefarious state actor, in either case nobody we want involved in the kernel.
@krzk @axboe @monsieuricon I thought linux.dev was more so for enthuasists and kernel.org for maintainers?
But obviously I substantively agree with what you say, he's probably wanting an account like this to see more legitimate/cover his tracks more.
The guy's abusing the system as it is, and should be treated like any troll - i.e. not given anything.
We need better mechanisms to block people like this.
Before the difficulty of sending patches was enough of a barrier, but with AI now any old idiot can start playing games like this :)
Wild times guys
I thought linux.dev was more so for enthuasists and kernel.org for maintainers?
@ljs @axboe @monsieuricon Ah, true, maintainer/reviewer OR “ongoing history with Linux kernel development”: https://korg.docs.kernel.org/linuxdev.html
kernel.org is for maintainers handling code, but there are many people listed in MAINTAINERS which do not handle the code but have M: status, mostly for individual drivers.
@krzk @axboe @monsieuricon yeah have seen a bunch of maintainers use it as well to be fair!