Conor Dooley
Posts
464Following
143Followers
149I like cycling, powerlifting, bad video games and metal.
Otherwise, I occupy my time with various bits in RISC-V land.
~useless, placeholder, website: https://www.conchuod.ie/
Conor Dooley
conor
Yes, thanks for this amazing email that I've got tonight in multiple languages because someone signed up to a mailing list with this garbage enabled.
1
0
0
Conor Dooley
conor
Feels like a shame to put a brake on a track bike, but at least it has me back out riding it. No longer feel self sacrificial enough to take it out in the city brakeless!
0
0
3
@pdp7 I have the following in mine:
# Patch syntax highlighting
color normal white default
color body brightwhite default ^[[:space:]].*
color body brightwhite default ^(diff).*
color body green default ^[\+].*
color body red default ^[\-].*
color body brightblue default [@@].*
color body brightwhite default ^(\s).*
Does the job fine ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
# Patch syntax highlighting
color normal white default
color body brightwhite default ^[[:space:]].*
color body brightwhite default ^(diff).*
color body green default ^[\+].*
color body red default ^[\-].*
color body brightblue default [@@].*
color body brightwhite default ^(\s).*
Does the job fine ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1
0
0
Conor Dooley
conor
Edited 1 year ago
https://social.kernel.org/notice/AUYMfmHof5yHSkpLJA
Huh, so I finally figured out tonight why this was happening (and it was bothering me for months with false positives) but the attached pushed me to actually fix it.
The script in Linux to generate compile_commands.json takes a few arguments. There's a positional one:
"paths
directories to search or files to parse (files should be *.o, *.a, or modules.order). If nothing is specified, the current directory is searched"
and an optional one:
"-d DIRECTORY, --directory DIRECTORY
specify the output directory used for the kernel build (defaults to the working directory)"
Turns out that passing the build directory as one of the positional arguments is a no-go, as it will *mostly* work, but not pick up things like the kernels types (u32 etc) nor be able to use the symbols defined from Kconfig.
Instead, shoulda been passing it as --directory...
Call me biased, but perhaps the help text is not clear enough given doing it wrong "almost" works!
Huh, so I finally figured out tonight why this was happening (and it was bothering me for months with false positives) but the attached pushed me to actually fix it.
The script in Linux to generate compile_commands.json takes a few arguments. There's a positional one:
"paths
directories to search or files to parse (files should be *.o, *.a, or modules.order). If nothing is specified, the current directory is searched"
and an optional one:
"-d DIRECTORY, --directory DIRECTORY
specify the output directory used for the kernel build (defaults to the working directory)"
Turns out that passing the build directory as one of the positional arguments is a no-go, as it will *mostly* work, but not pick up things like the kernels types (u32 etc) nor be able to use the symbols defined from Kconfig.
Instead, shoulda been passing it as --directory...
Call me biased, but perhaps the help text is not clear enough given doing it wrong "almost" works!
1
0
2
Conor Dooley
conor
I love clangd, but man is it annoyingly wrong some times. My OCD really really hates this one:
1
0
0
Conor Dooley
conor
@monsieuricon I do not use an app, just the website. Going to https://social.kernel.org/main/friends produces nothing other than 500 errors for me. Notifications works though!
1
0
0
Conor Dooley
conor
The diagnostics from clangd really suffer from too many false positives. Mostly ends up getting ignored, even when it's right, as a result :/
0
0
1
Conor Dooley
conor
Not checked out the netdev stats before, but kinda sucks that Microchip is #2 for negative.
The mpu32/at91 people here maintain the cadence macb stuff (which is all I've contributed to), so I figure we are at worst neutral for that particular driver.
The mpu32/at91 people here maintain the cadence macb stuff (which is all I've contributed to), so I figure we are at worst neutral for that particular driver.
1
0
0
Conor Dooley
conor
I don't get the point of these mails. Not exactly helping me understand *what* is suspicious about it? Why would I want to cancel it?
0
0
0
