Posts
467
Following
143
Followers
151
The cat is not mine :(

I like cycling, powerlifting, bad video games and metal.
Otherwise, I occupy my time with various bits in RISC-V land.

~useless, placeholder, website: https://www.conchuod.ie/
conor

Conor Dooley

Reply to
@ljs don't worry, that's what we all are running CI etc for :)
1
0
1
conor

Conor Dooley

Reply to
@ljs @broonie @monsieuricon There are a few options for send-email and format-patch that'd reduce some of the manual steps there (as well as things like the branch description that can store your cover) but the managed approach that b4 will give you is probably a order of magnitude easier to get right.
0
0
1
conor

Conor Dooley

Reply to
@llvm The essay seems like the stick rather than the carrot!
0
0
0
conor

Conor Dooley

Good ole DJ Church killing it at hooker today :)
0
0
0
conor

Conor Dooley

Reply to
@llvm I'm far from suggesting that the tags be removed, it's more a question for me of wonder what the tag has been given for?
"I don't know how to apply meaning to them" rather than "these tags are useless and should be removed"?
0
0
0
conor

Conor Dooley

Reply to
@llvm How is one supposed to know that, and assign appropriate value to the tag, if they do not provide review comments publicly?
0
0
0
conor

Conor Dooley

Reply to
@broonie I guess my point was that if the tag is given on the list, you "know" that it's been given for the version that was posted. If it comes from inside an SoC vendor, it may not have been.
1
0
0
conor

Conor Dooley

Reply to
@broonie by old do you mean vN-1, or something from some time ago?
If it's the former, at least one can tell what got the tag.
When it's internal, from someone who is not active in a mailing list, it's hard to assign any meaning.
1
0
0
conor

Conor Dooley

Sending out patches with internal reviewed by tags seems so meaningless to me.
I've never seen these people before, what do their tags mean?
1
0
1
conor

Conor Dooley

What that treesitter doin'?
0
0
0
conor

Conor Dooley

https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2023/risc-v-business-testing-starfives-visionfive-2-sbc

Interesting post from @geerlingguy about the visionfive2, but also a bit of a reflection on the RISC-V software ecosystem in general.
0
2
2
conor

Conor Dooley

Reply to @monsieuricon
@monsieuricon @ljs @monsieuricon working with gmail message-ids has a different problem. In my inbox, I get the message-id "CAK9=C2Uy_0B6D2TGq35sfrGkp9s1Td=cEsidzDPTDhG7Nq5EWw@mail.gmail.com" but the mbox file created by b4 is "CAK9_C2Uy_0B6D2TGq35sfrGkp9s1Td_cEsidzDPTDhG7Nq5EWw@mail.gmail.com.mbx".
Not a big deal, but frequently trips me up!
0
0
1
conor

Conor Dooley

Reply to
@ljs @monsieuricon Jokes aside, part of me really wants to submit patches as "Conchubhar O'Dubhlaigh" instead of "Conor Dooley" (both are acceptable under the former wording) but but it'd just cause confusion...
0
0
1
conor

Conor Dooley

Reply to @monsieuricon
@monsieuricon Interesting post, thanks.

So, submitting a patch with "Signed-off-by: Eagle <eagle@small-medium-company.com>" wouldthen okay, as the IT dept. of small-medium-company could verify it.
Similarly, Marcan could verify that Lina is Lina if something came to pass there.
But $unknown-contributor submits something under their online alias should still be challenged?
0
0
0
conor

Conor Dooley

Huh, probably wouldn't have known about this had it not appeared here:
https://social.treehouse.systems/@fox/109938758111808053

Certainly nice for the Lina's of the world, but I wonder how far "known identity" goes. "If I google it, I'll find them"?
1
0
1
conor

Conor Dooley

Reply to
@marcan If the maintainers are AWOL, they should be removed from MAINTAINERS , as they're not exactly maintaining anything /shrug
0
0
6
conor

Conor Dooley

Reply to
@bagder Simon Stalenhag is fantastic!
0
0
1
conor

Conor Dooley

https://noc.social/@phoronix/109927186270858469

hah, love the unmatched photo! Better off with a picture of the VisionFive 2 that actually supports the extension ;)
0
0
1
conor

Conor Dooley

Reply to @conor
Edited 2 years ago
My venerable VG248QE had its display port die this week, so not the best of fortunes for my hardware lately!
1
0
0
conor

Conor Dooley

Edited 2 years ago
Think I fell victim to a dead Samsung 980 overnight:/

Didn't have the firmware version that's supposedly bad, but system died overnight. Boot was getting stuck decrypting LUKS & now can't even reinstall from a livecd :)
1
0
1
Show older
About social.kernel.org

Terms of service

  1. Please do not use this service in violation of the Linux Kernel Code of Conduct. Doing so will result in your account suspension with the referral of the matter to the CoC committee.

  2. "Repeating"/"boosting" someone else's status on this platform will be treated as endorsement and will fall under rule #1.

  3. You are encouraged to use this platform to promote your work on the Linux Kernel, but there is no restriction on permitted topics (with the exception of anything covered by #1 above).

  4. There is no requirement to post in English, but it should be considered the primary language of communication on this platform.

Privacy notice

The admins of this service have access to all posted statuses. They aren't looking, but if it's something they shouldn't know about, then you should not post it on this platform.

Please see the Linux Foundation Privacy Policy, which applies to this platform as well.

Getting your own account

If you would like an account on this instance, please check that the following applies to you:

  • You are listed in MAINTAINERS or CREDITS

  • OR: You have a kernel.org account or email address

  • OR: You have a long and established history of involvement with the Linux Kernel

If the above is true and you agree with the Terms of Service and Privacy Notice listed above, please use these instructions to request an account: