@monsieuricon I wrote a longer take elsewhere, which is IMHO somewhat balanced point of view :-) Or at least I feel that I've found myself the right balance how I see the world from here forward ...
"I think the strategical challenge for companies and workplaces is actually when not to use AI i.e., balancing between human labour and automation.
ATM, the balance is completely broken, which is not shocking because new tech trends cause some mayhem and chaos.
My experiences on this topic are:
1. Linux kernel. I just write patches by handle like always. The screenshot shows what happens if I try to use AI with Linux kernel. When you know one project really well, it might be also easier to just write code. Otherwise it's like "C-to-English-to-C-WTF-#%%##%-C-AGAIN!?-..." generator, and the only outcome is what can be seen in the screenshot.
2. When using codegen for anything, have at least a single unplugged day in a week. It really can keep slop under control, and it helps to keep your AI use in those four other days simple, effective and productive :-)
3. Despite having all that knowledge and deduction even the strongest frontier model is just a fancy non-modifiable database with a hardcoded program run by inference at the data center. I strongly believe that the real benefits come only when a really good lawyer uses AI for "law stuff", developer for "developer stuff" and a scientist "sciency stuff".
Maximalists, shitfluencers and that type of scum and scammers have tried to sold the world the idea of human labour being obsolete and only an expense but really it's the only fuel that makes thing actually work.
One for the humankind, cheers 🍻"