Jarkko Sakkinen
Posts
4803Following
319Followers
489OpenPGP: 3AB05486C7752FE1
@diondokter @ekuber BUT on bright sound: I have pattern to solve output issues i.e., json output :-) it's easier than capsulating a file to a temp crate at least (and does not contaminate compilation results).
1
0
0
@diondokter @ekuber but that's life and everything has disadvantages but this being a "Microsoft bug" does not make it better.
1
0
0
@diondokter @ekuber
~/work/github.com/jarkkojs/tpm2_library main*
❯ scripts/rustc-error.py tpm2_protocol tpm2_protocol/src/lib.rs message/mod.rs
error[E0412]: cannot find type `TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialCommand` in this scope
--> tpm2_protocol/src/message/mod.rs:65:6
|
65 | (TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialCommand, TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialResponse, NvUndefineSpaceSpecial),
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: a struct with a similar name exists: `TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialResponse`
|
::: tpm2_protocol/src/macro/struct.rs:93:9
|
93 | pub struct $name {
| ---------------- similarly named struct `TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialResponse` defined here
|
::: tpm2_protocol/src/macro/mod.rs:174:25
|
174 | $( $variant($cmd), )*
| ---- due to this macro variable
~/work/github.com/jarkkojs/tpm2_library main*
❯ scripts/rustc-error.py tpm2_protocol tpm2_protocol/src/lib.rs message/mod.rs
error[E0412]: cannot find type `TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialCommand` in this scope
--> tpm2_protocol/src/message/mod.rs:65:6
|
65 | (TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialCommand, TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialResponse, NvUndefineSpaceSpecial),
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: a struct with a similar name exists: `TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialResponse`
|
::: tpm2_protocol/src/macro/struct.rs:93:9
|
93 | pub struct $name {
| ---------------- similarly named struct `TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialResponse` defined here
|
::: tpm2_protocol/src/macro/mod.rs:174:25
|
174 | $( $variant($cmd), )*
| ---- due to this macro variable
1
0
0
@diondokter @ekuber I absolutely hate this so much but I'll survive :-) https://github.com/puavo-org/tpm2_library/commit/f29d1a536af50ae55412ba36a23f957e3b1e0561
It does the job at least.
It does the job at least.
1
0
0
@diondokter @ekuber I did some reseach and unfortunately rustc works like that :-/
well what can you do...
well what can you do...
1
0
0
@ekuber @diondokter but yeah it's a workaround i manage to do refactorizations about 10x slower than with C and more error prone with the same factor :-) quite bad tho
1
0
0
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko
@ekuber @diondokter of course i use less as workaround for crappy compilation flow or actually head -100 or similar
1
0
0
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko
@ekuber @diondokter can you make it stop on the first error catched? that would pretty much sort my issues.
1
0
0
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko
Edited 25 days ago
I learned a new thing in macro_rules! i.e., pattern matching:
tpm_struct! {
#[derive(Debug, Default, PartialEq, Eq, Clone)]
kind: Command,
name: TpmStartAuthSessionCommand,
cc: TpmCc::StartAuthSession,
no_sessions: true,
with_sessions: true,
handles: {
pub tpm_key: crate::data::TpmiDhObject,
pub bind: crate::data::TpmiDhObject,
},
parameters: {
pub nonce_caller: Tpm2bNonce,
pub encrypted_salt: Tpm2b,
pub session_type: TpmSe,
pub symmetric: TpmtSymDefObject,
pub auth_hash: TpmAlgId,
}
}
tpm_struct! {
#[derive(Debug, Default, PartialEq, Eq, Clone)]
kind: Response,
name: TpmStartAuthSessionResponse,
cc: TpmCc::StartAuthSession,
no_sessions: true,
with_sessions: true,
handles: {
pub session_handle: TpmSession,
},
parameters: {
pub nonce_tpm: Tpm2bNonce,
}
}
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko
Edited 28 days ago
I can do this:
rustc --crate-type lib --crate-name tpm2_protocol tpm2_protocol/src/lib.rs --edition=2021 --emit=mir
Cool. Can I compile a single file from a crate project? This would be great when doing large refactor and not get your terminal DOS'd :-)
It's pain really. ATM, I'm refactoring out a macro called "tpm_response!" (it is replaced with pre-existing "tpm_struct!" that is extended) and I need to do similar changes to few dozen files.
I'd like to:
1. Do the edit to a single file.
2. Try if that file compiles.
3. Move on to next files.
Lack of knowledge with this makes refactors in Rust living hell TBH ...
Some constrains in my project that might help (possibly):
1. no_std
2. no deps
3. no alloc
Another way to express this: what is "gcc -c" of rustc?
#rust
rustc --crate-type lib --crate-name tpm2_protocol tpm2_protocol/src/lib.rs --edition=2021 --emit=mir
Cool. Can I compile a single file from a crate project? This would be great when doing large refactor and not get your terminal DOS'd :-)
It's pain really. ATM, I'm refactoring out a macro called "tpm_response!" (it is replaced with pre-existing "tpm_struct!" that is extended) and I need to do similar changes to few dozen files.
I'd like to:
1. Do the edit to a single file.
2. Try if that file compiles.
3. Move on to next files.
Lack of knowledge with this makes refactors in Rust living hell TBH ...
Some constrains in my project that might help (possibly):
1. no_std
2. no deps
3. no alloc
Another way to express this: what is "gcc -c" of rustc?
#rust
3
1
1
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko
@diondokter I can try this and share the results :-) I have to say that I don't know but I'll test this thanks.
1
0
0
@diondokter
[I edited the message had to think a bit what I meant.]
OK so, this would stdcall in C:
int __attribute__((__stdcall__)) foo() { asm(" ...
This would be naked stdcall
__attribute__((__naked__)) int __attribute__((__stdcall__)) foo() { asm(" ...
So you're correct saying that in naked version you do what you want but the difference is that you're telling GCC that "I will use stdcall". This makes the function compile equally well in Linux and Windows.
GCC won't create epilogue and prologue for you but it will make the assumptions based on stdcall how you've organized the function from callers perspective. I don't know how to do this in Rust.
[I edited the message had to think a bit what I meant.]
OK so, this would stdcall in C:
int __attribute__((__stdcall__)) foo() { asm(" ...
This would be naked stdcall
__attribute__((__naked__)) int __attribute__((__stdcall__)) foo() { asm(" ...
So you're correct saying that in naked version you do what you want but the difference is that you're telling GCC that "I will use stdcall". This makes the function compile equally well in Linux and Windows.
GCC won't create epilogue and prologue for you but it will make the assumptions based on stdcall how you've organized the function from callers perspective. I don't know how to do this in Rust.
1
0
0
Jarkko Sakkinen
repeated
repeated
pHinnWeb
phinnweb@ravenation.club[video] Blastromen (a.k.a. Sami Koskivaara & Mika Rosenberg) - Live @ Hellsinki Industrial Festival, Tiivistämö, Helsinki, Finland, 8 November 2024.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g10owNrqthA
#Blastromen #electro #electronic #DominanceElectricity #HellsinkiIndustrialFestival #SamiKoskivaara #MikaRosenberg #Tiivistämö #Helsinki #Finland
0
2
0
Jarkko Sakkinen
repeated
repeated
Behind The Console
behindtheconsole@podcasts.social
Edited 28 days ago
Real or @NanoRaptor #datArena
Well this an IBM 5120 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_5120 a preliminary system to the IBM PC.
1
2
0