Posts
4941
Following
327
Followers
492
Linux kernel hacker and maintainer etc.

OpenPGP: 3AB05486C7752FE1
@Netux I can share the context that led me ripping my hairs of:

https://github.com/puavo-org/tpm2_library/commit/0e79aff5ed4ea52c553b97e74f2bdbb4819ffb84

This was due misconducted major refactoring, and type of refactoring that you cannot simply use some "LSP do the magic" button but have to conduct with ultimate care. I got mixed up in the middle because I was not anymore sure of errors that are just due incomplete changes, and those that are bugs caused by me during refactorization process. I finished it anyway because I was "too far to head back" ;-)

It took me two days and two sleepless nights to conduct that fix (these are the worst wher you have dozen of scattered 1-2 line tweaks here and there). The Python script I did, despite archaic help definitely keep my head together with these. I've also like "sacrified my life" for three weeks to write down this 7000 line protocol crate, which probably also makes me a bit more "trigger frenzy" than the usual grumpy me ;-)
1
1
1
@Netux I can share the context that led me ripping my hairs of:

https://github.com/puavo-org/tpm2_library/commit/0e79aff5ed4ea52c553b97e74f2bdbb4819ffb84

This was due misconducted major refactoring, and type of refactoring that you cannot simply use some "LSP do the magic" button but have to conduct with ultimate care. I got mixed up in the middle because I was not anymore sure of errors that are just due incomplete changes, and those that are bugs caused by me during refactorization process. I finished it anyway because I was "too far to head back" ;-)

It took me two days and two sleepless nights to conduct that fix (these are the worst wher you have dozen of scattered 1-2 line tweaks here and there). The Python script I did, despite archaic help definitely keep my head together with these. I've also like "sacrified my life" for three weeks to write down this 7000 line protocol crate, which probably also makes me a bit more "trigger frenzy" than the usual grumpy me ;-)
1
1
1

I'm dying here. Just had a customer come in, asking where his drink was. We never got any mobile orders for him.

"I asked ChatGPT to order it for me and it said I could pick it up."

7
17
3
@Netux IMHO my python script was much better workaround :-) JSON output is the thing with rustc because otherwise data is unmanageable... But from that you cherry pick the stuff you care.
1
0
1

Jarkko Sakkinen

Edited 2 months ago
@diondokter @ekuber Sorry I was just super frustrated :-) On plus side, I can refine that Python script over time and perhaps get something useful out of json output. And thanks for all thet tips! It's the part I don't like in this compiler but nothing is perfect 🤷
0
0
1
@diondokter @ekuber BUT on bright sound: I have pattern to solve output issues i.e., json output :-) it's easier than capsulating a file to a temp crate at least (and does not contaminate compilation results).
1
0
0
@diondokter @ekuber but that's life and everything has disadvantages but this being a "Microsoft bug" does not make it better.
1
0
0
@diondokter @ekuber

~/work/github.com/jarkkojs/tpm2_library main*
❯ scripts/rustc-error.py tpm2_protocol tpm2_protocol/src/lib.rs message/mod.rs

error[E0412]: cannot find type `TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialCommand` in this scope
--> tpm2_protocol/src/message/mod.rs:65:6
|
65 | (TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialCommand, TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialResponse, NvUndefineSpaceSpecial),
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: a struct with a similar name exists: `TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialResponse`
|
::: tpm2_protocol/src/macro/struct.rs:93:9
|
93 | pub struct $name {
| ---------------- similarly named struct `TpmNvUndefineSpaceSpecialResponse` defined here
|
::: tpm2_protocol/src/macro/mod.rs:174:25
|
174 | $( $variant($cmd), )*
| ---- due to this macro variable
1
0
0
@diondokter @ekuber I did some reseach and unfortunately rustc works like that :-/

well what can you do...
1
0
0
@ekuber @diondokter but yeah it's a workaround i manage to do refactorizations about 10x slower than with C and more error prone with the same factor :-) quite bad tho
1
0
0
@ekuber @diondokter of course i use less as workaround for crappy compilation flow or actually head -100 or similar
1
0
0
@TalesFromTheArmchair nope but it looks interesting, thanks :-)
0
0
0
@ekuber @diondokter can you make it stop on the first error catched? that would pretty much sort my issues.
1
0
0
@Netux yeah, so would hard to apply to the context let's put it that way :-)
1
0
1
And noticed a bug in that message that has gone unnoticed :-) with_sessions should be true also for the response.
0
0
0

Jarkko Sakkinen

Edited 2 months ago

I learned a new thing in macro_rules! i.e., pattern matching:

tpm_struct! {
    #[derive(Debug, Default, PartialEq, Eq, Clone)]
    kind: Command,
    name: TpmStartAuthSessionCommand,
    cc: TpmCc::StartAuthSession,
    no_sessions: true,
    with_sessions: true,
    handles: {
        pub tpm_key: crate::data::TpmiDhObject,
        pub bind: crate::data::TpmiDhObject,
    },
    parameters: {
        pub nonce_caller: Tpm2bNonce,
        pub encrypted_salt: Tpm2b,
        pub session_type: TpmSe,
        pub symmetric: TpmtSymDefObject,
        pub auth_hash: TpmAlgId,
    }
}

tpm_struct! {
    #[derive(Debug, Default, PartialEq, Eq, Clone)]
    kind: Response,
    name: TpmStartAuthSessionResponse,
    cc: TpmCc::StartAuthSession,
    no_sessions: true,
    with_sessions: true,
    handles: {
        pub session_handle: TpmSession,
    },
    parameters: {
        pub nonce_tpm: Tpm2bNonce,
    }
}
1
0
1

Jarkko Sakkinen

Edited 2 months ago
I can do this:

rustc --crate-type lib --crate-name tpm2_protocol tpm2_protocol/src/lib.rs --edition=2021 --emit=mir

Cool. Can I compile a single file from a crate project? This would be great when doing large refactor and not get your terminal DOS'd :-)

It's pain really. ATM, I'm refactoring out a macro called "tpm_response!" (it is replaced with pre-existing "tpm_struct!" that is extended) and I need to do similar changes to few dozen files.

I'd like to:

1. Do the edit to a single file.
2. Try if that file compiles.
3. Move on to next files.

Lack of knowledge with this makes refactors in Rust living hell TBH ...

Some constrains in my project that might help (possibly):

1. no_std
2. no deps
3. no alloc

Another way to express this: what is "gcc -c" of rustc?

#rust
3
1
1
@diondokter I can try this and share the results :-) I have to say that I don't know but I'll test this thanks.
1
0
0
Show older