Conversation
ljs

hobbyist arches should be removed from the kernel.

Change my mind.
4
0
3
lkundrak@metalhead.club

HAMMER SMASHED FILESYSTEM 🇺🇦

Reply to @ljs

@ljs says a hobbyist

1
0
2
ljs

Reply to @lkundrak@metalhead.club
@lkundrak no longer ;)

Obviously I am fine with hobbyists, I am not fine with hobbyist arches that cause constant maintenance pain
2
0
1
triskelion@floss.social

Tris

Reply to @ljs
Edited 6 months ago

@ljs Instructions unclear, removed Linux kernel from Arch repo

1
0
1
lkundrak@metalhead.club

HAMMER SMASHED FILESYSTEM 🇺🇦

Reply to @ljs

@ljs mm/ causes constant maintenance pain

0
2
3
ljs

Reply to @triskelion@floss.social
@triskelion ok but just don't replace it with hurd please?
1
0
1
monsieuricon

K. Ryabitsev

Reply to @ljs
@ljs Way to put your foot down on bad arch support.
1
1
3
ljs

Reply to @monsieuricon
@monsieuricon LOL my god you didn't do that pun did you? YOU DIDN'T??

Feel like I need to cc: @ptesarik here as he is the foot guy here
1
0
2
monsieuricon

K. Ryabitsev

Reply to @ljs
@ljs @ptesarik I always intend my puns, dammit. ;)
0
0
3
oleksandr@natalenko.name

Oleksandr Natalenko, MSE verified

Reply to @ljs

@ljs x86 should be removed first

1
0
2
ljs

Reply to @oleksandr@natalenko.name
@oleksandr Muscovite arch?
1
0
0
oleksandr@natalenko.name

Oleksandr Natalenko, MSE verified

Reply to @ljs

@ljs that baikal shit too

1
0
0
lkundrak@metalhead.club

HAMMER SMASHED FILESYSTEM 🇺🇦

Reply to @oleksandr@natalenko.name

@oleksandr @ljs in fact there should be just pdp-11

0
2
2
ptesarik@fosstodon.org

Petr Tesarik

Reply to @ljs

@ljs @triskelion Someone has told me that Windows is POSIX compliant…

2
0
1
oleksandr@natalenko.name

Oleksandr Natalenko, MSE verified

Reply to @ptesarik@fosstodon.org

@ptesarik @ljs @triskelion Debian GNU/NT

0
0
1
ljs

Reply to @ptesarik@fosstodon.org
@ptesarik @triskelion was, in the past, in the loosest humanly possible definition
0
0
1
vbabka

Reply to @ljs
@ljs @lkundrak what if some hobbyist arch gets suddenly employed by Oracle one day :(
0
0
1
About social.kernel.org

Terms of service

  1. Please do not use this service in violation of the Linux Kernel Code of Conduct. Doing so will result in your account suspension with the referral of the matter to the CoC committee.

  2. "Repeating"/"boosting" someone else's status on this platform will be treated as endorsement and will fall under rule #1.

  3. You are encouraged to use this platform to promote your work on the Linux Kernel, but there is no restriction on permitted topics (with the exception of anything covered by #1 above).

  4. There is no requirement to post in English, but it should be considered the primary language of communication on this platform.

Privacy notice

The admins of this service have access to all posted statuses. They aren't looking, but if it's something they shouldn't know about, then you should not post it on this platform.

Please see the Linux Foundation Privacy Policy, which applies to this platform as well.

Getting your own account

If you would like an account on this instance, please check that the following applies to you:

  • You are listed in MAINTAINERS or CREDITS

  • OR: You have a kernel.org account or email address

  • OR: You have a long and established history of involvement with the Linux Kernel

If the above is true and you agree with the Terms of Service and Privacy Notice listed above, please use these instructions to request an account: