Posts
565
Following
37
Followers
2376

Jonathan Corbet

“Millions of people around the world will soon consider large models ‘hoovering up’ all their work to be an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions,” an internal Microsoft document cited in the case read, adding “almost no one intended for content they created to be used in this fashion, nor are they compensated for its use.”

https://www.404media.co/doom-loop-openai-and-microsoft-admits-llms-are-destroying-the-web-and-built-on-theft/
1
44
43
@david_chisnall This actually aligns fairly well with how I've seen the kernel community deal with the GPL. @torvalds once gave me some real grief for suggesting in a talk that a bit more licensing-infringement litigation might be a good thing; his point was that exclusion from the community is a far more potent weapon.

And say what you will, but the kernel community has had a lot of success in (eventually) convincing companies to play along.

But yes, I don't think the GPL has a lot of force when it comes to keeping companies from using any project of mine in proprietary ways.
0
0
11

RE: https://mastodon.social/@nixCraft/117241250895962141

Ok, genuinely, tech journalists need to investigate why so much money is being laundered into Omarchy. A bunch of slopware from a white supremacist does not deserve $18 million when real Linux projects have gone unfunded for years. There has to be something else going on here.

3
21
1

Jonathan Corbet

The US federal government, it seems, is worried that the Chinese are engaged in "distillation" from US large language models

https://media.defense.gov/2026/Sep/08/2003992823/-1/-1/1/CSA_CHINA_BASED_AI_COMPANIES_MALICIOUS_DISTILLATION_AGAINST_US.PDF

"China-based AI companies route distillation requests through multiple pathways to gain
unauthorized access, consequently violating U.S. AI companies’ terms of use."

I'm shocked that an AI company would do such a thing. Certainly no US-based AI company would route requests through multiple paths to gain access...right...?
3
12
36

I miss the old-fashioned FOSS drama, where if you knew someone’s three-letter initials and they were an asshole, you just called them an asshole or ignored them, and didn’t worry that (1) they were a vengeful billionaire and/or (2) that they represented the pending downfall of democracy

4
9
0
@alrj I am surprised that people seem to think I'm unaware of that. Seriously...I live in Boulder... my question is what they think a "hash collision" is.
2
0
5

Jonathan Corbet

Just got a nifty bit of spam from a bot claiming to represent Weedmaps (a site for people trying to find cannabis products). They were, it seems, much impressed by an LWN article on hash collisions and were wondering if we could find it in our hearts to mention them there.

I am still trying to understand just what a "hash collision" would mean in that context; perhaps I don't have enough weed in the house to obtain the necessary insight.
8
5
38
@etchedpixels @jwildeboer ...but definitely stopped LinuxCare... sometimes you *really* miss the window.
0
0
1
@gregkh @KernelRecipes Heh ... I have a similar plot from the 7.2 development-statistics article that I'm thinking of using...
1
5
6
Some talks just write themselves, @KernelRecipes is going to be fun this year!

(not that it's not fun every year, but you get the idea...)
9
42
90

Jonathan Corbet

So why didn't I think of this business model?

1) Poke LLMs for a while and see which nonexistent URLs they hallucinate most often.

2) Register those domains and put malicious web sites behind them.

3) Profit!

https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-cyberattacks-llm-slop-squatting

(What a world we have made...)
2
25
31

Jonathan Corbet

Out on my bike, when I had this feeling I was being watched...
0
4
41

Jonathan Corbet

Today at LWN we got a pitch from a prospective author of kernel-related material, offering to cover stuff that we've covered well already.

Included therein was this text: "Why I'm the right person for this: [I'd fill this in with your own background here — e.g. kernel contribution history, mailing-list involvement,
relevant professional experience, or prior writing]"

It forgot to tell this person to point out their attention to detail as well.
3
16
59
@pinskia Congratulations! I know well what a challenge you have taken on here...it's not easy to keep it going week after week.
0
0
2
@davidgerard You left out the part about letting the LLMs commit patches. What could possibly go wrong?
1
2
10
@sjvn That quote shows up in the Velvet Underground episode of "A history of rock in 500 songs":

https://500songs.com/podcast/episode-164-white-light-white-heat-by-the-velvet-underground/

It's excellent, as are all the episodes there; this is the production that finally forced me to create a Patreon account so I could toss money at its creator.
0
0
1
@paulmckrcu My condolences. Saying goodbye is a hard thing, even after the best of runs.
1
0
2

Jonathan Corbet

Doing my part to keep the -rc releases small
1
3
39
Edited 1 month ago

Some Stanford researchers dredged out the absolute dregs of r/AmITheAsshole for all those stories where _zero_ humans supported the poster, where one hundred percent of them said yes, you are unambiguously the asshole, and fed them into LLMs as first person scenarios to see what the LLM had to say.

Unethical, harmful, cruel, criminal, didn't matter: the slopbots took the faux poster's side about half the time.

Edit: preprint on arxiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01395

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aec8352

1
19
0
Show older