The CrowdStrike developer who wrote the defective update knocking out computer systems around the globe proves that one person really can make a difference.
The more you understand computers, the more you value systems without them.
just heard someone call the people who can't resist looking at their bright little phones in a movie theatre "moth people" and I will be using this moving forward
an old libcurl answer of mine on stackoverflow being questioned because I did not provide links to back up my statement when answering questions about code I wrote...
https://stackoverflow.com/a/28714247/93747
π
(but yeah, I have stopped answering questions over there)
Wrote a pretty good Windows emulator in {fmt}:
#include <fmt/color.h>
int main() {
fmt::print(bg(fmt::color::blue),
"{:1600}", "Your PC ran into a problem and needs to restart.");
}
AAARRRGGGHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
Channel 4 News, in talking about today's #Microsoft #CrowdStrike fuckup, stated that the expected Y2K effect was imaginary.
No! No! NO!
We* did a massive amount of work to update and ensure systems would keep on working. And more importantly WE TESTED EVERYTHING FULLY BEFORE GOING LIVE.
(* As in everyone responsable for operating computer systems around the world!)
(added note: Channel 4 is a UK national television station, not local)
Mastodon is the world's biggest community of people who deeply love computers and also think that the world would probably be better off without computers
I donβt know what a crowdstrike is, and at this point Iβm too afraid to ask.
Any sufficiently privileged shitcode is indistinguishable from a cyberattack.
"Linux would have prevented this!" literally true because my former colleague KP Singh wrote a kernel security module that lets EDR implementations load ebpf into the kernel to monitor and act on security hooks and Crowdstrike now uses that rather than requiring its own kernel module that would otherwise absolutely have allowed this to happen, so everyone please say thank you to him