Posts
1777
Following
90
Followers
167
Riding horses, hacking computers, phones and smartwatch.
@KernelRecipes "If you are using latest stable / longterm kernel, your system is insecure, too" -- me. Plus, you are running code that is more experimental than mainline releases, as a bonus (!).
0
0
2
@kees @KernelRecipes Some people need reminding that marking every bugfix as CVE will not help with security. It will just make people ignore the CVEs.
0
0
2
@kees @KernelRecipes Greg & company is introducing so many false positives into the CVE system that CVEs are now completely useless for kernel. Good job! :-( (And calling it "a few false positives" is not really a good sign).
1
0
0
@LaF0rge @mcc How would that work and what attacks would it prevent?
0
0
0
@mkyral @fabia_man @logout Mechaniku mam, ale hodily by se mi 3.5" diskety :-).
1
0
1
@lawondyss Ne, spis je to pojistka proti zkazenym potravinam :-).
1
0
0
Pokud vas zajima, copak se to nedavno delo u Titanicu, tak youtube: USCG\ Titan\ Submersible\ Hearing\,\ Sept.\ 16\,\ Day\ 1\ \[avp_-wN3ekA (Titan implosion).
0
0
0
@mkyral @archos @amarok @rholas Jasny, dam to na svuj TODO list, hned za studenou fuzi, 3x+1 problem a EM drive :-).
0
0
1
@pony Sometimes they place sign after the car is parked. Life is not fair...
0
0
0
@lawondyss Ono by to fungovalo i s minci nebo necim jinym tezsim... jen ja mel po ruce sroub (a trochu jsem vyrobil chytak).
1
0
0
@mkyral @amarok @archos @rholas Prave ze elektronicky to udelat nejde, protoze tam neni videt co ten pocitac dela. https://xkcd.com/2030/
1
0
0
@amarok @mkyral @archos @rholas Kde berete tu jistotu? :-(. Bankovnictvi je jednoduche, protoze tam neni pozadavek na anonymitu. Plus, samozrejme, bezpecne neni, jen ztraty jsou pro banky prijatelne, tak to tak nejak funguje. Coz je zase rozdil proti volbam.

Navrhnete on-line volebni system ktery nebude nebezpecny, a muzem si o tom popovidat.
1
0
0
@mkyral @archos @amarok @rholas Tak samozrejme, kdyz proste nepustis strany k volbam, tak se da podvadet ve velkem... ale vsichni vedi ze Belorusko podvadi (napr.). Pocitace umoznuji podvadet nenapadneji.
1
0
0
@mkyral @amarok @archos @rholas Za klicove povazuju to, ze v papirovych volbach ma kazda strana moznost si v zasade udelat "vlastni scitani" -- mit zastupce v komisi -- tj. vsichni vi, ze se nepodvadelo.
2
0
1
@mkyral @archos @amarok @rholas Nevim. Dle popisu -- tyrana docela pekne obchazi moznosti volit elektronicky vickrat. Ok. Ta zmena rezimu + natlak uplne nechapu. Ale nejak nevidim proc bych mel verit tomu, ze to vladni servery sectou dobre. V papirovych volbach se muzu jit podivat, a jasne ze nevidim jestli nekde neni chyba o par hlasu, ale vetsi manipulace by byla videt. Ale jak mam verit cizimu pocitaci?!
1
0
0
@mkyral @archos @amarok @rholas Funguje neznamena ze je to bezpecny... nebo dobry napad. Viz treba ta wikipedia...
1
0
0
@ganch @postmarketOS @droidian If it has mainline kernel support, it is good candidate. Otherwise... why care? :-).
0
0
1
@mkyral @z8th @amarok @archos @rholas wiki: "This criticism was underscored in May 2014, when a team of international computer security experts released their examination of the system, claiming they could breach the system, change votes and vote totals, and erase all evidence of their actions if they were to install malware on Estonian election servers." Nevim. Kdo kontroluje servery, kontroluje volby, a na rozdil od papiroveho hlasovani neni mozne jednoduse mit zastupce vsech stran v mistnosti.
0
0
0
@mkyral @amarok @archos @rholas No... rekl bych ze elektronicky to moc udelat nejde, kdyz chcem podobne zaruky jako mame u beznych voleb...
1
0
0
@lawondyss Ne. Ten led je tam take dulezity :-).
1
0
0
Show older