Jarkko Sakkinen
Posts
3373Following
202Followers
339
@vbabka AFAIK or at least for my practical use reflog is can be translated as "undo log" and resetting to any state in it does not mix up rebase state. It will just continue whatever is underneath. Definitely a worthwhile git sub-command to learn properly...
1
0
1
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko
Edited 4 months ago
During holidays I found about #IBM Plex: https://www.ibm.com/plex/
Love this font! Best thing from IBM in years.
Love this font! Best thing from IBM in years.
1
1
4
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko
Edited 4 months ago
I'd guess that some years and we are predestined to see a triumph of #AI exploitation.
I'd guess there's opportunities in that area for behavioral exploitation, making it do unwanted things.
Even more so there's opportunities for scavenging "confidential leaks" from large LM's, to downright reverse engineering. Sometime in-house codebase might be seeded by mistake to a public LM...
Or hackers could exploit your network and instead of copying any data they would use LM as an indirect path to scavenge good quality enough information to meet the goals.
If I was working on offensive security like for some intelligence department, I'd put a lot of resources on exploiting the AI assistants for instance. Exploiting that functionally would open countless doors.
#infosec
I'd guess there's opportunities in that area for behavioral exploitation, making it do unwanted things.
Even more so there's opportunities for scavenging "confidential leaks" from large LM's, to downright reverse engineering. Sometime in-house codebase might be seeded by mistake to a public LM...
Or hackers could exploit your network and instead of copying any data they would use LM as an indirect path to scavenge good quality enough information to meet the goals.
If I was working on offensive security like for some intelligence department, I'd put a lot of resources on exploiting the AI assistants for instance. Exploiting that functionally would open countless doors.
#infosec
0
1
0
@railmeat @cuchaz
Actually this nails pretty much what is wrong in politics/federal/legislation etc. side of this.
It is all about "a consumer must be able to pick a web browser". I think much more effective legislation tool for EU commission etc. would be to enforce the browser sync feature to be interoperable. Cross-browser interoperable.
That would lead into browser vendors to making a common standard for sync and world would be a better place, and more open for competition. E.g. then any open source web browser could adhere to this standard, including some antique like w3m for instance. Or browser made for old home computer.
Actually this nails pretty much what is wrong in politics/federal/legislation etc. side of this.
It is all about "a consumer must be able to pick a web browser". I think much more effective legislation tool for EU commission etc. would be to enforce the browser sync feature to be interoperable. Cross-browser interoperable.
That would lead into browser vendors to making a common standard for sync and world would be a better place, and more open for competition. E.g. then any open source web browser could adhere to this standard, including some antique like w3m for instance. Or browser made for old home computer.
0
1
0
@railmeat @cuchaz
Actually this nails pretty much what is wrong in politics/federal/legislation etc. side of this.
It is all about "a consumer must be able to pick a web browser". I think much more effective legislation tool for EU commission etc. would be to enforce the browser sync feature to be interoperable. Cross-browser interoperable.
That would lead into browser vendors to making a common standard for sync and world would be a better place, and more open for competition. E.g. then any open source web browser could adhere to this standard, including some antique like w3m for instance. Or browser made for old home computer.
Actually this nails pretty much what is wrong in politics/federal/legislation etc. side of this.
It is all about "a consumer must be able to pick a web browser". I think much more effective legislation tool for EU commission etc. would be to enforce the browser sync feature to be interoperable. Cross-browser interoperable.
That would lead into browser vendors to making a common standard for sync and world would be a better place, and more open for competition. E.g. then any open source web browser could adhere to this standard, including some antique like w3m for instance. Or browser made for old home computer.
0
1
0
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko
Edited 4 months ago
Of all of call codebases I've seen, compiled and successfully tested including Symbian OS, AOSP, Chromium etc. I think just as a build #Servo is one of the worst I've seen so far. It has a nice site, progress and everything but IMHO getting nice and easy build should be a primary target.
I'll give another shot tomorrow on compiling that mess :-)
I tried for fun to do my first trials on macOS because I thought that it is Rust so everything must be great. Was a mistake that I still regret ever doing that. I don't even want to begin how badly planned it is. I'll give it a shot with my Fedora system next time.
I'll give another shot tomorrow on compiling that mess :-)
I tried for fun to do my first trials on macOS because I thought that it is Rust so everything must be great. Was a mistake that I still regret ever doing that. I don't even want to begin how badly planned it is. I'll give it a shot with my Fedora system next time.
0
0
0
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko
Edited 4 months ago
I already said this once but if you do your work in #GNOME, for most casual business use GNOME Web is a functional tool. And it has the #Firefox sync.
I turn Firefox on, only on my leisure time. The name rings to me like s.. night club in 1st place.... i.e. not something I should eagerly use for committing any business.
Has been pretty obvious equation in my case longer than the ad-gate.
It reminds to be seen ofc whether/if Mozilla starts to do same with Firefox as Google did with Chrome, i.e. I would not hold my breath of the sync feature working forever in this open manner.
I turn Firefox on, only on my leisure time. The name rings to me like s.. night club in 1st place.... i.e. not something I should eagerly use for committing any business.
Has been pretty obvious equation in my case longer than the ad-gate.
It reminds to be seen ofc whether/if Mozilla starts to do same with Firefox as Google did with Chrome, i.e. I would not hold my breath of the sync feature working forever in this open manner.
1
0
3
Jarkko Sakkinen
repeated
repeated
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko
with all these #AWS, #Azure etc. developer certificates around, I wonder if there is a "zero certificates for life" #certificate that I could apply for somewhere?
1
0
1
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko
My apartment is about 7 min walk from central railway station of Tampere and I get these all the time. I really have to fight myself of not fuzzing in...
0
0
0
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko
One of the best foods ever: Georgian national dish hatsapuri. Competes strongly with Portugalian street food classic prego in my charts.
1
0
2
@aks In kernel or any other big open source project, we have had that privilege of getting code for free for decades. So we've had AI privilege before modern AI industry even existed, or even anyone pursued of that opportunity even in distant dreams. That is sort of how open source works or is the core idea.
1
0
1
@aks Like think of "AI assisting with writing code"
Then I'd like think that why not make better constructs so that extra computational power required for AI is pursued for something more useful computation. So from that gist I think tools should be thought off.
For me the sign that e.g. a programming language needs an AI assistant, it is not about AI replacing a human as a programmer but that there is something inherently wrong in the tool or ecosystem in the first place. This is not same as saying that ML's etc would not have any good purpose use.
Then I'd like think that why not make better constructs so that extra computational power required for AI is pursued for something more useful computation. So from that gist I think tools should be thought off.
For me the sign that e.g. a programming language needs an AI assistant, it is not about AI replacing a human as a programmer but that there is something inherently wrong in the tool or ecosystem in the first place. This is not same as saying that ML's etc would not have any good purpose use.
2
0
1